Ink Blot Tests and ‘actors’ at the Boston bombings

Advocates of ‘actors’ at the Boston bombings tend to use a highly subjective approach to analysis of the evidence, similar to the way Rorschach inkblot tests are used to analyze a person’s personality and emotional functioning.

I recently wrote an article explaining the reasons why I think there were no ‘actors’ used in place of victims at the Boston Marathon bombings. In that article I made reference to other websites and researchers who had taken up the ‘actors’ meme and run with it. In this article I’ll be looking more closely at the ‘evidence’ that has been presented in support of the ‘actors’ theory. Before I begin though, I should explain how and why my approach differs from the approach that the ‘actors’ advocates have taken.

When trying to decide whether a particular conspiracy theory, or particular angle on a conspiracy theory, is likely to be true or false, my approach is to first look at the plausibility of the theory in question. In terms of the Boston bombings, the idea that ‘actors’ took the place of real victims is the theory. When I first was forced to consider this theory, it took me about 3 minutes of rumination before it began to make no logical sense whatsoever. I more or less spelled out the lack of logic in my previous article, but it can be summed up as: why would a U.S. intel agency chose to use actor victims at a bombing that is designed to terrify the US population into believing that evil terrorists are out to kill them when they could very easily just plant a bomb and let the bomb do what bombs do best, kill and maim people? Read more »

Did Mooslim Terrorists Attack the Boston Marathon? You Bet Your Ass They Did!

While mainstream news outlets haven’t dared to suggest it yet, it’s totally obvious to me (and a large percentage of ignorant people in the US and Europe) that Muslim terrorists were responsible for the bombs at the Boston Marathon today. I mean, seriously, who ELSE could possibly have the motive to attack American citizens in the process of exercising (oh cool, a pun!) their divinely and constitutionally-mandated right to run around the streets of America’s greatest cities? Everyone knows that Mooslims hate running, and let’s not forget that they attacked one of the WTC towers from Boston’s Logan airport. COINCIDENCE?? I think NOT!

Don’t listen to the boolsheet that some people are spreading that the “gun nuts” did it because they were angry that the Marathon organisers had set up a special marker at the end of mile 26 to honor the Sandy Hook dead. That’s NOT true!

Look, it’s obvious that the whole “fight them over there so we don’t have to fight them here” approach HASN’T WORKED! They ARE HERE, NOW! So come on folks, don’t hold back, don’t wait for the lamestream media to ‘grow a pair’ and tell the truth that we all already KNOW (I mean, is 12 years of mind-programming not enough for christ’s sake?!). We need to NOOK them out of their spider holes all around the US. Sure, that might cause some collateral damage to Americans, but, ya know, ain’t it worth it to protect our Freedumbs and Dimocrazy??

Until then, grab your guns (before they’re taken away by that foreign interloper in the White House) and let’s go git them thar Mooslims! We’ve had enough already!! You heard it first here.

Confirmation that US Govt. uses Death Squads to create ‘Civil War’ in Iraq

James Steele, Cheney and Rumsfeld’s ‘Mr. death-squad’ in Iraq.

Ten years ago, more or less to the day, I wrote the following on the then Signs of the Times page:

“As I sit here, a motion in the UK House of commons has been defeated by some 415 votes to 149. Not that any other result would have stopped the US, yet it signifies a full green light for the attack on Iraq. Bush’s ‘ultimatum’ to Saddam expires at midnight (GMT) Thursday (7pm EST). “Shock and Awe” (read “death and destruction”) may come at any time between now and then. We have at most one day, one day left to ponder at the edge of the abyss before the coming darkness engulfs us all.

As if to mock those who are against this illegal invasion and the lies and deceit that have been used to justify it, Ari Fleishcer today stated that, even if Saddam went into exile now, the US would still invade. It’s not about WMD, it’s about domination and the destructive principle. Perhaps Ari feels he can be more truthful now that it is a ‘done deal’, now that Cheney, Rumsfeld and Blair have told the peace-loving people of the world to go f**k themselves. It must have been hard for Fleischer to stand up in front of the world’s media every day and lie so profusely. (Then again, maybe not).

It’s hard for me to describe the feelings I have right now; there is an enormous sense of impending doom, mixed with anger at being made to feel so helpless in the face of such rampant psychopathy. Who are these men that they can simply decide to throw the world and its inhabitants into “war without end”, and who are we that they could, for so long, fool us with such pathetic and barely-disguised lies and know that we would just roll over and let them get away with it?” Read more »

Britam Defence: Leaked Documents: False Flags are Standard Operating Procedure for Western Governments

Western-backed death squads in Syria aka ‘al-qaeda’

Western governments (in league with their Middle Eastern client states) began their proxy war attack (via paid mercenaries aka ‘al-qaeda’) on Syria in 2011. The ongoing Syria campaign is just the latest in a long line of direct or indirect attempts at ‘regime change’ by the Western (and global) elite over the past 10 years (although their history of attacking and destabilizing and overthrowing sovereign governments goes back at least 100 years).

Each time I have commented on these illegal and inhuman invasions and proxy wars, I have pointed to the evidence that we are not, and never have been, dealing with a ‘popular revolution’ or  a ‘civil war’ or a ‘terrorist threat’, but rather, always and everywhere with the age-old, tried and tested murderous tactics and outrageous lies of Western powers.

These type of ‘regime change’ operations include the use of several scurrilous, brutal and, frankly psychopathic tactics: Read more »

New Radio Show: Gun Control USA: Do Guns Protect Civil Liberties?

This week we discussed (along with our guest) the major legacy of the Sandy Hook massacre (other than those brutally murdered): the gun control debate, and pretty much outed it as a distraction to the real problem: Corrupt and psychopathic government.

Show archive here:

http://www.blogtalkradio.com/sottnet/2013/01/27/gun-control-usa-do-guns-protect-civil-liberties

Enjoy.

Sandy Hook Hoaxes and the Terror of the Situation

[Note: this is an edited and expanded version of a previous article titled "Sandy Hook and Christopher Rodia - Most 'Conspiracy Theorists' Can't Think"]

Many of the most notable events in modern (and even ancient) history have provoked some form of ‘conspiracy theory’. That is to say, ordinary people were not satisfied with the official story about how the event unfolded because all or some aspects of that story simply did not objectively make sense. Despite what the mainstream media would like us to believe about ‘conspiracy theories’, most conspiracy theories are based on objective problems with the official narrative. But note that I said ‘based on’. The problem with conspiracy theories is that, while they usually reflect a more accurate overview of a major event, they are forced to rely on theory (due to deliberate with-holding of data by official sources) rather than hard evidence (which would disqualify them as theories) and are therefore open to abuse by people who tend to use their imaginations to complete the picture rather than the more critical functions of the human mind.

Compared to other similar events where many people found the official story implausible, the Sandy Hook massacre has provoked a veritable flood of conspiracy theories, and many of them are not based on any hard evidence. Read more »

Sandy Hook on Gotham City Map – Plausible Explanation

In relation to the Sandy Hook reference in the latest Batman movie, I wrote:

“The only plausible explanation I can come up with right now to explain this, is that, somehow, someone involved in the production of the movie decided to use the name Sandy Hook because it is the real name of an area close to NYC and Gotham is supposed to be a fictional version of NYC. But it would be useful if someone from the production of the Batman movie could come forward and offer some explanation for what, right now,  seems to be a very bizarre coincidence.”

No one has come forward, but there is now a plausible explanation for why the name Sandy Hook was used on the map of Gotham city.

Scott Getzinger died in a car crash on April 7th 2012. Mr. Getzinger, who was born in Bradford CT. but lived in Newtown CT., worked as a property master in the film and television industry, providing props for more than 25 movies, including “Spider-Man,” “Independence Day,” “The Truman Show” and the upcoming “Men in Black III” and “The Dark Knight Rises.” A property master on a movie is responsible for the props, and it seems possible that given that Mr. Getzinger lived near Sandy Hook CT. he might have been responsible for choosing that name for a location on the Gotham City map in the Batman movie.

The Sandy Hook Massacre: Unanswered Questions

When 20 children and 8 adults were murdered in the Sandy Hook Elementary school massacre I, like most other people, were shocked and horrified at what appeared to be an act of senseless brutality. When a person experiences the tragic and untimely loss of a loved one, particularly in unusual or apparently inexplicable circumstances, the initial intense feelings of grief usually give way to a desire to understand HOW and WHY the tragedy occurred, in an effort to make sense of it and achieve some kind of ‘closure’. This is a very normal and natural human reaction. We have an innate need to understand the world around us and how things ‘work’. In our modern, technological world, most of what we understand about our world and how it works is provided to us by some authority or other. And most of us accept the conclusion of those authorities as being true. In some cases, those explanations are true. Read more »

21/12/2012, Truth and the End of the World

In an article on Sott.net earlier this year entitled How is the World Going to End in 2012?, Laura Knight-Jadczyk wrote:

The world is ending in 2012. That is, the final implementation of the fascist, totalitarian New World Order will be accomplished this year and you will be in that “New World” that the global elite have designed for you, and planned to implement for a very long time now. Oh, indeed, similar New World Order’s have been staged in the past on smaller scales, but this time it’s global because they are all in on it together! Former ‘New World Order’s’ didn’t really fail, even if they ostensibly fell; they’ve just been passing the torch around for millennia, spreading the disease, growing the sickness in society, until finally, now, with global communication and incredible weapons of destruction in their hands, they are ready to finalize the Faustian bargain that you, the people, signed with your blood.

That’s what 2012 is all about. It’s not about some grand and glorious transformation or ascension to another existence! It’s not about being ‘raptured’ to heaven at the right hand of Jesus because you helped to ‘initiate the Eschaton’! It’s not about ‘Starseeds’ being taken aboard spacecraft and getting airlifted to some other planet of the ’5th dimension’, but it is also not about ‘life continuing on as normal’. Pure and simple, prophecy is coming true, it’s just that it’s going to much more mundane and much less sensational than you might have imagined. It is the end of your world as normal, free human beings, and your reduction to pure grinding slave-hood, your children turned over to be sex toys or cannon fodder for psychopaths, and there’s nothing you can do about it now.

Those are some pretty serious charges! Are they in any way an accurate description of human life on planet earth at the end of 2012? Read more »

Gotham City Located in South West Connecticut in ‘Young Justice’

Just a quick post re: the links to the Newtown massacre and superhero fiction.

In the animated superhero TV series ‘Young Justice’ during the episode entitled, coincidentally enough, “Schooled”, an onscreen map shows Gotham City is located in Southwest Connecticut. This is strange because Gotham city is generally understood to be a fictional representation of NYC.  The Sandy Hook school massacre took place in Newtown, which is located in Southwest Connecticut, and Sandy Hook was named as a target area of Gotham city in the latest Batman movie.

Sandy Hook, Newtown, SW Connecticut