Part of Pratt City, a suburb of Birmingham, Alabama
According to General (Ret.) Wesley Clark, that was the Neocon (and CIA) plan in the immediate aftermath of the September 11th 2001 attacks. After Iraq, the countries slated for being “taken out” were, Iraq, Syria, Lebanon, Libya, Somalia, Sudan and Iran. But the best laid plans of mice and psychopaths often go awry, and Iraq was no cake-walk and the masses of humanity weren’t entirely as hoodwinkable as people like Cheney, Rumsfeld, Wolfowitz et al liked to believe. But what is interesting is the fact that we are currently seeing a major NATO i.e. (US) operation against Libya, and now the British, French and Italian oligarchies are urging “sanctions” against Syria, and there have been “anti-government protests” in Lebanon and Iran.
In the much- quoted 2004 New York Times Magazine article, journalist Ron Suskind described a 2002 conversation with a senior Bush advisor — widely assumed to be Karl Rove:
“The aide said that guys like me were ‘in what we call the reality-based community,’ which he defined as people who ‘believe that solutions emerge from your judicious study of discernible reality.’ I nodded and murmured something about enlightenment principles and empiricism. He cut me off. ‘That’s not the way the world really works anymore. We’re an empire now, and when we act, we create our own reality. And while you’re studying that reality — judiciously, as you will — we’ll act again, creating other new realities, which you can study too, and that’s how things will sort out. We’re history’s actors … and you, all of you, will be left to just study what we do.’ “
It’s probable that, given their belief that they “create their own reality”, the Neocons believed that they actually could orchestrate “regime change” in seven countries in five years with US troops on the ground. The actual reality, as we have seen, has been radically different. “Quagmire” just doesn’t get it and the truth of the matter is that all normal human beings will always recognise and resist occupation and corporate plunder and slavery, regardless of the extent or sophistication of the propaganda and lies. Read More →
Alitalia flight crew were forced to overpower a man who pulled a knife on their passenger flight and tried to divert it to Libya.
As 131 passengers looked on in terror, the would-be hijacker held a knife to the throat of an air-stewardess and ordered the Paris to Rome flight diverted to Tripoli.
‘The man grabbed the stewardess from behind her back and pointed the knife. She was in difficulty and tried to turn around,’ a passenger named Sofia told reporters.Stefanie, a French woman who lives in Italy, said the man laughed when the stewardess asked him to go the front of the plane with her.
‘He held her for just a few minutes and then the other flight attendants intervened and passengers helped hold the man to the floor,’ she said.
After the would-be hijacker was subdued the plane landed safely at Rome’s Leonardo da Vinci airport, where he was held.
Iraqi civilian being beaten by British soldiers in 2003
“Operation Iraqi Freedom”, that’s what they tried to sell it to us as. Some, in fact most, of us knew right from the beginning that the Bush regime et al were exporting death and occupation, not freedom and democracy, and importing oil and natural resources. That’s why at least 36 million people around the world (the real figure probably being much higher) demonstrated in March 2003 against the illegal invasion of Iraq, with 3 million Italians on the streets of Rome constituting the largest ever anti-war protest. Even in the culturally, socially and politically isolated US of A, it only took two years of the Iraq ‘war’ to convince a majority of the population that they were being (badly) lied to by the smirking chimp spokesman for big business.
It’s been over 8 years since Iraq’s sovereign nation status unofficially ended on the day 100,000+ US and British troops (and many more plain clothed psychos) landed on Iraqi soil. ‘Time heals all things’, they say, but that’s mostly a bunch of crap. The only thing time really does is allow for the lies on which the vast majority of major world events are based, to be slowly revealed. Sometimes very slowly.
Operation Iraqi occupation and plunder then. How exactly do you go about invading, subduing and occupying an entire nation?
Why do Palestinian armed resistance groups consistently make such a hash of effective resistance? Such groups regularly launch impotent rockets towards Israel, supposedly in an effort to win freedom from Israeli occupation, only to have said ‘rockets’ land (almost always) harmlessly in the desert. To add insult to injury, such attacks are then used by the Israelis as justification to respond, in a massively disproportionate way, with their deadly US-made missiles against the Palestinian population as a whole.
On virtually every occasion when a ‘Middle East peace deal’ has provoked a bout of existential jitters among the Israeli elite because it looked like it might actually force them to the negotiating table, some ‘armed Palestinian group’ has obligingly carried out some misguided attack against an Israeli target, or launched a few Qassam’s at the Israeli desert. Who then can argue that, overall, the Palestinian’s long struggle for independence has been a lesson in how to shoot oneself in the foot, over and over again.
Does anyone believe it anymore? I really wish I had access to a reliable census on what the majority of people in this world believe about the purported ‘Islamic terror threat’, 9/11 etc. etc. Over the past 10 years several US 9/11 polls have been published. Depending on which of the shockingly few mainstream media corporations you prefer, somewhere between 36% and 62% of the US public believe that the US government is, at the very least, not telling the truth about the 9/11 attacks. If true, (and we have every reason to believe that the media corps down-play the figures) what does that mean for public perception of the ‘Islamic terror threat’ on which the 9/11 attacks are based?
If a majority of human beings can, at this stage, see through most of the increasingly crass US, British, French and Israeli government and assorted ‘Intelligence’ agency hyperbole and propaganda, can we expect them to just drop the whole charade any time soon? Sadly, recent media reports suggest otherwise and point to a deepening of the global psychological operation to which we have all been subjected these past 10 years. A still from the most recent ‘al-Qaeda’ video released by Intel Center featuring Adam Gadhan
“Media reports”. We use and hear that term so often in reference to the ‘war on terrorism’ that we can easily forget what it actually means. It means that everything you know, or think you know, about the global terror threat has come to you via media corporations that are either owned or controlled by the governments that are waging the ‘war on terror’ and profiting handsomely from it. Does that bother anyone?
To make matter worse, the stories you watch, listen to and read concerning what’s what and who’s who in Muslim terror-land are invariably provided by the intelligence arms of the same governments. There are no ‘al-Qaeda’ TV or radio stations, no ‘Muslim Terrorism’ weekly magazines with articles and Op-Eds penned by Osama and his alleged cohorts. And before you protest, all of the ‘al-Qaeda’ internet video and audio tapes that you vaguely remember seeing and hearing have long since been deemed so suspect by objective analysis that they are inadmissible as reliable evidence.
Take for instance the recent reappearance of ‘Adam Gadhan’, the all-American ‘home-grown’ spokesman for Osama bin Laden. Gadhan was born Adam Pearlman, the son of Californian hippy goat-rearing parents and the grandson of Anti-Defamation League board member, Dr. Carl Pearlman with whom Adam lived during his childhood. During his teenage years, Adam dabbled in the death metal scene before finally opting for Islam, to which he converted when he was 17. Soon thereafter, he seems to have disappeared off the face of the planet for a while, with reports (from Intel agencies) claiming that he moved to Pakistan in 1998, where, at the tender age of 19, he is said to have married an Afghan refugee.
In March 2001, he cut off all contact with his family, just before Muslim Terror Inc. went live. Later that year, he reemerged (on the internet) with a new name, Adam Yahiye Gadahn’, a new Muslim beard and elevated to the position of “senior commander to Bin Laden translator, video producer, and cultural interpreter.” I kid you not. Since then Adam has been the front man for ‘As-sahab’, allegedly the media arm of ‘al-Qaeda’, and has starred in several video messages where he attempts to combine Californian schmooze with radical Islamic ideology…to limited success. Here’s one such video dispatch for your viewing pleasure (note, you can tell he’s reading a prompter):
That particular video was released a few years ago by Intel Center, which has released most of the ‘al-Qaeda’ audio and video tapes. Intel Center claims to be a “private contractor working for intelligence agencies” that “studies terrorist groups and other threat actors and disseminating that information in a timely manner to those who can act on it.” It is also a stone’s throw from CIA HQ in Virginia. Owned by Verisign, which operates “two of the Internet’s thirteen root nameservers, the generic top-level domains for .com, .net, .cc, .name and .tv”, Intel Center’s CEO is Ben Venzke, a former US intelligence officer. Alongside Venzke is ‘Director of Threat intelligence’, Jim Melnick who served 16 years in the US army and the Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA) and worked in psychological operations. The IDEFENSE website described him this way a few years ago:
Prior to joining iDefense, Mr. Melnick served with distinction for more than 16 years in the U.S. Army and the Defense Intelligence Agency. During this period, Mr. Melnick served in a variety of roles, including psychological operations, international warning issues with emphasis on foreign affairs and information operations and Russian affairs. He also served in active political/military intelligence roles with an emphasis on foreign affairs. Mr. Melnick is currently a U.S. Army Reserve Colonel with Military Intelligence, assigned to the Office of the Secretary of Defense.
Note that Melnick was assigned to the Office of Donald “Go massive sweep it all up. Things related and not” Rumsfeld’. Melnick does more or less the same job for another company called ISight Partners. Basically, he has his finger on the pulse of all potential ‘cyber-threats’ and works for a company (Verisign) that should have no problem at all in identifying precisely where in the world any ‘al-Qaeda’ video or audio message had been uploaded to a server. With his military Intel background, surely he could then notify the recruits manning the predator drones in the CIA’s Arizona bunker? Apparently not, because the stars of all these ‘al-Qaeda’ videos are still at large, after 10 years, and the only people receiving the predator’s special brand of freedom and democracy are innocent Afghan and Pakistani villagers. Although I shouldn’t be too hard on the Intel Center guys, they are clearly a talented bunch, after all, it takes serious intel savvy to predict the release of an ‘al-Qaeda’ video in advance!
Al Qaeda is set to release a new video tape featuring one of the suicide bombers from last year’s London attacks, according to Ben Venzke at the IntelCenter. Venzke says the as-Sahab production house will be putting out a tape on the Internet sometime Thursday that includes a video last will and testament of Shahzad Tanweer as well as a new statement from the al Qaeda number two leader Ayman al-Zawahiri.
The tape is also expected to include former Californian Adam Gadahn, who now goes by the name of Azzam al-Amriki. Gadahn is believed by U.S. authorities to be running the al Qaeda propaganda operation from a secret location somewhere inside of Pakistan.
If you’d like the inside scoop on when the CIAIntel Center ‘al-Qaeda’ plans to release another fascinating dispatch from the front lines of Langley ‘Tora Bora’, their ‘Terrorism Threat Intel Package’ can be yours for $1,499 per user per year. Really, it’s well worth the money, they put a lot of effort into making these videos available. Consider, for example, the 2006 ‘al-Qaeda’ video featuring Islamic terrorism’s Mr Magoo, Ayman al-Zawahiri. After its release, the video was analyzed by computer security consultant Neil Krawetz. During a presentation he gave at the BlackHat security conference in Las Vegas in 2007 about analyzing digital photographs and video images for alterations and enhancements, Krawetz showed that the video had been altered in a very interesting way.
Using a program he wrote (and provided on the conference CD-ROM) Krawetz could print out the quantization tables (that indicate how the image was compressed) and determine the last tool that created the image – that is, the make and model of the camera if the image is original or the version of Photoshop that was used to alter and re-save the image.
This is the image from the video he analyzed.
A still from the the Intelcenter-faked “al-qaeda” video
After conducting his error analysis, Krawetz was able to determine that the writing on the banner behind al-Zawahiri’s head was added to the image afterward and at the same time as the logo of Intel Center.
Moving along. Remember al Zarqawi? He was the guy who almost single-handedly provoked ‘civil war’ in Iraq, or so we were told. Apart from the fact that he could barely shoot a gun, (here’s a quick video clip)
Abu Musab al-Zarqawi, the terrorist leader believed to be responsible for the abduction of Kenneth Bigley, is ‘more myth than man,’ according to American military intelligence agents in Iraq.
Several sources said the importance of Zarqawi, blamed for many of the most spectacular acts of violence in Iraq, has been exaggerated by flawed intelligence and the Bush administration’s desire to find “a villain” for the post-invasion mayhem.
US military intelligence agents in Iraq have revealed a series of botched and often tawdry dealings with unreliable sources who, in the words of one source, “told us what we wanted to hear”.
“We were basically paying up to $10,000 a time to opportunists, criminals and chancers who passed off fiction and supposition about Zarqawi as cast-iron fact, making him out as the linchpin of just about every attack in Iraq,” the agent said.
“Back home this stuff was gratefully received and formed the basis of policy decisions. We needed a villain, someone identifiable for the public to latch on to, and we got one.
None of which prevented the mainstream media from regaling us with this the other day:
British troops came close to capturing al-Qaida’s top commander and the occupation forces’ most wanted target in Iraq – but the operation collapsed after the only surveillance helicopter ordered to monitor him [followed him for 15 minutes and then] ran out of fuel and had to return to base, secret military intelligence logs suggest.
If I had a penny, (or a no-bid US govt. contract to rebuild a formerly flourishing Middle Eastern nation) for every time I’ve read about how close the US or British military came to catching [insert name of your favorite Islamic terrorist] only to have him somehow miraculously slip away, I’d be at least as rich as Tony Blair. But sadly, my chances of getting a no-bid US govt. contract are about as slim as Osama bin Laden after ten years living with kidney failure in a cave in Afghanistan, so I suppose I’ll just have to grin and bear the ignominy of having my intelligence insulted with further fantastic tales of terrorist Houdinis. It’s still kind of rude though. I mean, the official story of al Zarqawi’s life was ridiculous enough, but the story of his death must surely have provoked a massive bout of cognitive dissonance in even the most eager believer in Western benevolent militarism.
Here’s a little recap for your edification:
The official file on Zarqawi, whose real name was Ahmad Fadil al-Khalayleh, tells us that he was born in Jordan. Barely literate, he became a petty criminal until the call to arms came with the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan. After his time in the terror training camps of Afghanistan Zarqawi returned to his home with a radical Islamist agenda. The interesting part of his file, the part that is generally omitted from such reports, is that the training camps in Afghanistan before and during the soviet invasion of that country that Zarqawi attended, were funded and run by the CIA, making Zarqawi and others like him, assets of the US government.
Consider the words of Zbigniew Brzezinski, President Jimmy Carter’s National Security Adviser, in an interview in the 15-21 January 1998 edition of Le Nouvel Observateur
Question: The former director of the CIA, Robert Gates, stated in his memoirs [“From the Shadows”], that American intelligence services began to aid the Mujahadeen in Afghanistan 6 months before the Soviet intervention. In this period you were the national security adviser to President Carter. You therefore played a role in this affair. Is that correct?
Brzezinski: Yes. According to the official version of history, CIA aid to the Mujahadeen began during 1980, that is to say, after the Soviet army invaded Afghanistan, 24 Dec 1979. But the reality, secretly guarded until now, is completely otherwise. Indeed, it was July 3, 1979 that President Carter signed the first directive for secret aid to the opponents of the pro-Soviet regime in Kabul. And that very day, I wrote a note to the president in which I explained to him that in my opinion this aid was going to induce a Soviet military intervention.
Q: Despite this risk, you were an advocate of this covert action. But perhaps you yourself desired this Soviet entry into war and looked to provoke it?
B: It isn’t quite that. We didn’t push the Russians to intervene, but we knowingly increased the probability that they would.
Q: When the Soviets justified their intervention by asserting that they intended to fight against a secret involvement of the United States in Afghanistan, people didn’t believe them. However, there was a basis of truth. You don’t regret anything today?
B: Regret what? That secret operation was an excellent idea. It had the effect of drawing the Russians into the Afghan trap and you want me to regret it? The day that the Soviets officially crossed the border, I wrote to President Carter. We now have the opportunity of giving to the USSR its Vietnam war. Indeed, for almost 10 years, Moscow had to carry on a war unsupportable by the government, a conflict that brought about the demoralization and finally the breakup of the Soviet empire.
Q: And neither do you regret having supported the Islamic fundamentalism, having given arms and advice to future terrorists?
B: What is most important to the history of the world? The Taliban or the collapse of the Soviet empire? Some stirred-up Moslems or the liberation of Central Europe and the end of the cold war?
Q: Some stirred-up Moslems? But it has been said and repeated Islamic fundamentalism represents a world menace today.
B: Nonsense! It is said that the West had a global policy in regard to Islam. That is stupid. There isn’t a global Islam. Look at Islam in a rational manner and without demagoguery or emotion. It is the leading religion of the world with 1.5 billion followers. But what is there in common among Saudi Arabian fundamentalism, moderate Morocco, Pakistan militarism, Egyptian pro-Western or Central Asian secularism? Nothing more than what unites the Christian countries.
Zarqawi was on the CIA’s books for over twenty years by the time the Neocons came to power in 2000. When 9/11 just happened to gift them the ‘casus belli falsus’ to beat them all, they immediately went about the task of gathering together a group of likely fundamentalist Islamic patsies to take the rap for the Neocon’s war on fake Islamic terrorism, which wasn’t a war at all but rather the bludgeoning of millions of innocent people in the Middle East and S.E Asia in the interest of Empire or, to be more precise, the externalization of the Neocon’s psychopathology.
At 6am on June 7th 2006, a U.S. airforce F-16 dropped two 500lb bombs on a single isolated safe-house outside the city of Baqubah, 30 miles northwest of Baghdad, where, we are told, Zarqawi was staying with 5 comrades. In doing so, the NeoCons sacrificed a valuable ‘Islamic terrorist’ bogeyman. That is not to say, however, that Zarqawi was actually in that “safe house”.
Here’s an image of the house before it was bombed:
Now, have you ever seen the effects of a 500lb bomb? Have you ever seen the effects of two? Have a look:
Here’s an image of what was left of the house:
Now remember, we were told Zarqawi was in that house at the time of the bombing.
So after two massive pieces of ordinance were dropped, essentially on his head, this is the condition in which US troops allegedly found him
An abrasion on his cheek and a cut on his forehead and above his left eye. Is that ok then? Good.
So the question is, or rather, the question I am asking myself right now is: why am I even saying any of this? What’s my point? Do I even have one? The main reason for this little trip down the memory hole is Julian Assange. You see, I hold him (and what’s left of his Wikileaks shop front) responsible for the fact that I couldn’t just stop at Adam Gadahn/Pearlman. You’re probably aware that Wikileaks has released yet another armored truck-load of ‘war logs’, this time from Iraq, among which was the above tale of Zarqawi’s fortuitous escape from the clutches of the British. In this most recent download, the mainstream media has, once again, been gifted with a plethora of ‘logs’ that allow them to do three main things:
1) Dig up and retell the officially fabricated history of Muslim terrorists and terrorism
2) Remind the world that Iran is really to blame for everything
3) Reveal selected isolated stories of complicity in torture and killing of civilians by US and British forces and thereby provide Wikileaks’ bone fides as an honest anti-war organisation, despite the fact that much worse abuse had already been exposed long ago.
And so, I’m forced to try and set the record straight.
Added to this is the fact that, conveniently for the US military, the Wikileaks documents also affirm that most civilian deaths in Iraq have been caused by Iraqis and that the total number of Iraqi civilians who died as a result of the US invasion is a little higher than the official number recognised by the US government. In all, the Wikileaks documents claim an extra 15,000 civilians were killed, bringing the total to about 100,000. Assuming no one in the mainstream media or Wikileaks dares to mention the most reliable estimates of over 1 million excess Iraqi civilian deaths as a direct result of the invasion, both the Pentagon and Wikileaks can feel content that they’ve done their job.
> Iran – Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad Sunday inaugurated the country’s first domestically-built, long-range, unmanned bomber aircraft, calling it an “ambassador of death to Iran’s enemies.
Oooh! it’s gold and shiny!
Ya know, I’m sort of getting tired of all this. There isn’t going to be an attack on Iran any time soon, and Israel, the US and the Iranians know it. That’s why they’re all having so much fun. The major reason all of the sabre-rattling is going on is for OUR benefit, to keep humanity afraid, corralled and controlled, physically, mentally, emotionally and therefore, indirectly, spiritually.
Check out this link from a rabid, brain-dead right-winger in the US. It’s about the “ground zero Mosque”. Scroll down and look at the pictures from a recent demonstration. Read the slogans on the placards etc.
These people’s understanding of what is really going on in the world is so abysmal, so utterly wrong, that it’s ‘not even wrong’!
This is why civilisations and entire species disappear. When “consciousness units” reach a certain point of saturation with an entirely false and illusory perception of what actually IS, they are moved to the obsolete list. They no longer serve any purpose from the point of view of creation. They MIGHT survive and find a place for themselves in the grand scheme of things IF they had the power to manifest and maintain a world where their own illusions were actually real, but folks down here don’t have that power. The only reason they are still around is because they are not entirely to blame, they have, after all, been deceived by others into believing what they believe, but even the universe has a limit to its patience.
So all of a sudden we have “ground zero Mosque” and stories like that of Sakineh Mohammadi Ashtiani, the Iranian woman who has been “saved from stoning” in Iran. Does ANYONE think it is a coincidence that these stories appear as the US and Israel are banging the war drums about Iran and its non-existent/no threat whatsoever, nuke program? Just look at these stories and REALISE just how controlled our world and our perception of it is.
But let’s look on the bright side; the situation is SO bad that, for the next 6 months, when you see ANY stories that paint Muslims or Iran in a negative light, you can very safely assume, without any investigation (if you so choose), that they are 100% false. In fact, you can back-date that advice…oh, about 100 years.
For the record:
On the Mosque:
People who may or may not be Muslim purchased property. It is an abandoned Burlington Coat Factory, about 2 blocks from Ground Zero. There are no plans for a Mosque there.
On the stoning:
Iran doesn’t stone anyone. It doesn’t appear as a punishment on their penal books.
It has been proven that the US, British and Israeli governments and affiliated ‘intelligence’ agencies deliberately lied about the Iraq war and the ‘war on terrorism’ in general. It is not about terrorism, it is (largely) about oil and control of that vital resource. Any testimony from the the US, UK or Israeli governments and ‘Intelligence’ agencies about the war on terrorism should therefore be automatically rejected as not credible.
Don’t expect the mainstream media to ever admit the truth about the Iraq war or that which led to it. The mainstream media’s promotion of the Bush government lies about the Iraq invasion means they are complicit in the murder of more than 1 million Iraqi citizens. Like any accomplice to a crime, they will do all they can to hide their culpability.
“I am saddened that it is politically inconvenient to acknowledge what everyone knows, that the Iraq war is largely about oil” – Alan Greenspan former head of the Federal Reserve
Tin-pot Iraqi dictator-in-waiting, Ayad Allawi was the US-appointed ‘interim-Iraqi Prime Minister’ for 9 months in 2004-5. Today he defeated incumbent Nouri al-Maliki to the position of Prime Minister by 10,000 votes according to reports.
Now there’s one more CIA stooge ruling over yet another formerly sovereign nation and people.
Under CIA direction he ran an exile organization, the Iraqi National Accord, in the early 1990s that sent agents into Baghdad to plant bombs and sabotage government facilities in an effort to depose Saddam Hussein. Their targets included a mosque, a movie house and a newspaper — the latter strike killing a child passing by. Ex-CIA operatives said a bus full of schoolchildren was also blown apart.
As interim Iraqi Prime minister in 2004-5, Allawi was responsible for operating death squads out of the Iraqi interior ministry in an effort to divide Iraqi society and create the appearance of ‘civil war’ between Iraq’s Sunni and Shia populations and thereby divide and conquer the Iraqi resistance to US occupation lead by Moqtada al Sadr. On Thursday 14 October 2004, Allawi stated: “[w]e have asked Fallujah residents to turn over al-Zarqawi and his group. If they don’t do it, we are ready for major operations in Fallujah”. Fallujah, a city of 300,000 people was then mercilessly bombed. Tens of thousands of innocent civilians were killed, many of them horribly burned with illegal white phosphorus shells.
In 2004 it was reported that Allawi personally executed six bound ‘insurgents’ – ordinary Iraqis fighting US occupation.
On at least one occasion in 2004 Allawi personally intervened to prevent a ceasefire and peace talks with the Iraqi resistance because he realised that any just peace settlement in Iraq would, by popular mandate, not include either him or his CIA masters in a controlling position.
In 2005 arrests were issued for Allawi and 27 of his former ‘ministers’ in the interim government over the alleged disappearance or misappropriation of $1 billion in military procurement funds.
With Allawi as Prime Minister, Iraq will be more secure as the latest trophy in the American Empire’s cabinet, as will the the illegal contracts originally signed by Paul Bremer in 2004 to give all of Iraq’s resources to American companies.
Back in February this year, we were treated to the ridiculous story of ‘Terrorists With Explosive Breast and Implants‘, although at that point the story appears not to have been given much in the way of wide-spread coverage.
Fast forward to the end of March and amid reports that the images of your private parts taken by airport scanners are not exactly private and resistance to the use of the scanners on the rise, the follow story broke:
A security worker at London’s Heathrow Airport has received a police warning and faces disciplinary action over claims he ogled a female colleague using a full-body scanner, officials said yesterday.
The 25-year-old worker made lewd comments after his colleague Jo Margetson, 29, mistakenly strayed into the scanner, which can see through clothes to produce an image of the body, the Sun newspaper reported.
Ideally this story would have been used by the mainstream press to represent the growing public consensus that the scanners are a serious breach of privacy, but this is no ideal world, and the mainstream press has long since been little more than the government’s press office. The very same day then that the ‘Ogling’ story broke, for some cynical reason, mainstream media outlets chose to revisit the ‘Boob bomber’ with a vengeance. Google “breast implant bomb” and you’ll see that virtually all reports are from the 24th and 25th of March.
As to the very idea of boob and butt bombers, that apparently came courtesy of England’s private army, MI5/MI6, by way of right wing pundit and editor of WorldnetdailyJoseph Farah who originally published the claim on his news outlet back in February. Apparently Farah then spoke to the UK Sun tabloid newspaper and the story got new legs, breasts and buttocks. The Sun reported that, after the Christmas knicker bomber farce, MI5 “picked up chatter” that led them to the belief that boobs might be the new bombs. If this is true, then it’s probably not, given that English ‘intelligence’ agencies have a long track record of telling humongous porkie pies about terrorism.
Clearly the crotch bomb was a failure. Would boob or buttock bombs fare any better? It’s unlikely. First of all is the fact that the would-be bombers body would absorb most of the blast. Secondly you have the problem of how to detonate the fantastical device. “Excuse me madam, what is the purpose of those wires attached to your bosom?” You get the picture. It’s all for your entertainment, or your brainwashing, depending on how informed you are.