"Ever heard of six-degrees of separation?"
‘Six degrees of separation’ – that’s the idea that everyone on the planet is separated by only 5 (or maybe 6) other individuals. The idea may or may not have any basis in reality, but there’s no way for us to know because it has never been tested on a global scale, although if my experience on Facebook is anything to go by, I’d say it’s more like two degrees. Still, it’s an interesting (and rather complicated) idea to ponder, and it got me to thinking.
Run for your lives! It's 'tractor terror!'
Deep in the recesses of our collective human unconscious, the idea was there. But even the stoutest human soul trembled and fled at the merest suggestion that it might one day prove to be true.
You know of what I speak.
The ancient Babylonians knew it as Tiamat
The Greeks called it the Gorgon
To the Scandanavians it was the Kraken
But for humans unfortunate enough to live on planet earth at the dawn of 21st century the unspeakable horror is that which forms part of farming ‘gore-lore’ the world over.
Yes, I’m talking about…
Where's wally?
I’m sure we’re all very tired by now of the Osama bin Laden nonsense, I know I am, and I really wish it would just go away. Sadly, that seems an unlikely prospect in the near future.
I’ve already provided more than enough evidence for all rational people to seriously doubt the authenticity of the “Osama bin Laden is dead” story. I’ve also exposed the many faked images and videos of the alleged terrorist mastermind that were released over the past 10 years. But the US government and CIA aren’t ready to quit just yet. It would appear that they’re determined to push the boundaries of belief and exploit public credulousness to the max (and perhaps beyond).
You’re probably aware that yesterday, Sat. 7th May 2011, the US government released “new” videos of ‘bin Laden’ that they claimed were part of the haul from the ‘compound’ in Pakistan, which, by the way, is very conveniently scheduled for destruction. Read More →
ave already pointed out the many glaring inconsistencies in the official account of the the ‘killing of Bin Laden’. But even as I write the story continues to fall apart. According to Pakistani Urdu TV channel Geo News quoting Pakistani intelligence officials, the incident involved a search operation launched by the Pakistani forces “after a Pakistani army helicopter was shot down in the wee hours of Monday in Abbotabad” According the source, at about 1:20 a.m. local time a Pakistani helicopter was “shot down by unknown people in the Sikandarabad area of Abbotabad”. The Pakistani forces launched a search operation in the nearby area and “encountered with a group of unknown armed people. A fire exchange followed between the two sides.”Now, this could simply be a case of Pakistani officials attempting to save face in the context of a flagrant and very public breach of Pakistani sovereignty, but even so, the official US government story still makes no sense whatsoever, and given that it comes essentially from the same cabal of psychopathic war-mongers who gave us the Iraq war lies etc., we have every reason NOT to believe it.
All of the available evidence strongly suggests that Bin Laden died many years ago. Nevertheless, the war-mongers and ‘reality creators’ in the US of A and elsewhere decided that he was just too damn perfect as an terrorist mastermind (think baddie in James Bond) to let him (or us) off the hook so easily. So, they used his image and attributed the 9/11 attacks and a host of other ‘terrorist’ crimes since then to him (without any evidence). But the fact that he was, in reality, quite dead, was an issue that the backroom boys in the Pentagon and the CIA were always going to have to face one day. And in case you’re wondering, the idea of allowing him to simply fade from public awareness was a non-starter, not due to any considerations of honor or justice, but rather because of the massive ‘political capital’ that his capture or killing would provide.
So at some stage in the recent past, a plot was hatched in the bowels of the Pentagon and CIA HQ to stage the death of Bin Laden. Word has it that the real codename for this operation was either ‘die another day’ or ‘you only live twice’. (but don’t quote me on that.) Read More →
So first Osama was armed and used his wife as a human shield. Then he was armed and used some unnamed woman as a human shield. Finally, he wasn’t armed and didn’t use anyone as a shield. Now we are being told that there were no weapons, of any description in the entire house (only some chickens and buffaloes):
“Security officials said they did not recover any arms and explosives during their detailed search of the compound and the 13-roomed house, during which they removed two buffaloes, a cow and around 150 chickens.”
and British Telegraph reporter Peter Oborne, who visited the “Osama compound”, saw no bullet holes or any signs of a fire-fight at all!
“There were practically no signs of a fight when I arrived at the Khan’s family house. No bullet marks punctured the walls.”
Our latest effort at bringing some sanity to the the latest attack of mass gullibility and delirium.
embedded by Embedded Video
In this short video Kesier explains that the problem is not with “the system” but rather with the people who created the system and the people who run it. In short, our world is now structured in such a way that it selects for conscienceless psychopaths who are running our global society into the dirt.
embedded by Embedded Video
’nuff said.
As with most fabricated terror stories, the ‘Bin Laden is dead’ tale is full of contradictions, half-truths and outright lies. The fact that the story was fabricated from whole cloth is seen in the fact that the story is now changing from the details that initially ’emerged’.
Who precisely made the claim that ‘Osama’ had a weapon and shot at US forces and that he used a woman as a human shield? What situation could a US soldier have found himself in where he thought he was under direct fire from a person in a room when he was in fact not? What possible scenario could have played out where a person was perceived to have used a ‘human shield’ when that person did no such thing? These are the questions that need to be asked as part of a serious investigation into this matter. But don’t hold your breath.
As of now, we can only conclude that these two scenarios were simply made up as part of an initial report on the alleged death of Bin Laden and they point directly to a conscious plan, right from the beginning (or even long before the actual events of May 1st) on the part of US authorities to concoct a false story to be disseminated to the public.
