BBC and doctors in Syria: shilling for Western Psychopaths in Power?

by ⋅ 3 Comments
Dr. Rola. What about the babies in incubators?

Dr. Rola. What about the babies in incubators?

Two BBC news stories, one published on August 29th the other on September 30th, contain video of an alleged Syrian government “napalm” attack on a “Syrian school playground” during the last week of August 2013. The September 30th video refers back to the original story, one month previously.

Both videos are from the same ‘Panorama’ investigative reporting program that aired on August 30th, the same day that the UK parliament rejected Prime Minister David Cameron’s attempt to sanction the NATO bombing of Syria.

Both videos contain the testimony of an English doctor allegedly working with the supposedly humanitarian ‘NGO’ ‘Hand in Hand for Syria‘.

The doctor in question may be a Doctor Rola, who appears to be a British ex-pat or ‘exiled’ Syrian woman or, perhaps, the daughter of Syrian ‘exiles’.

Doctor Rola appeared on BBC’s Newsnight program on August 31st, 1 day after the UK parliament vote where she complained about the fact that Cameron’s move to attack Syria had been rejected.

The two video segments in question are a few minutes long and, like all of the BBC’s coverage of Western government’s proxy war in Syria, they attempt to make a case for the “Assad bombing his own people” (the same lies that we spread about Gaddafi). Read More →

Syria, Chemical Weapons and the Britam Defence emails

by ⋅ 1 Comment
A CIA/Mossad-backed Syrian rebel after snorting some potassium chlorate

A CIA/Mossad-backed Syrian rebel after snorting some potassium chlorate

In January this year, the web site of UK-based ‘offense defense contractor’, Britam Defense, were hacked by someone that ‘authorities’ claim (unsurprisingly) may have been of the Iranian persuasion (Iranians do everything bad these days don’t ya know!). Part of the trove of documents that were uploaded to various websites included two emails.

One email had “Syrian Issue” in the subject field and the other has “Iranian Issue” in the subject field. Both emails appeared to be from David Goulding, the actual business development manager of Britam Defence and appeared to have been sent to Phillip Doughty, the actual founder of Britam. Many alternative news web sites have used these emails as evidence that the recent alleged ‘chemical weapon’ attack in Syria was the work of the Western-backed Syrian rebels rather than the Syrian military. The problem however is that the emails appear to be have been faked. Read More →

Syria False Flag Chemical Attack – US, French and British Threaten to Unleash NATO Gimp

by ⋅ 1 Comment

mideast-syriaThey tried it at least once already, and that time, rather than the Assad government, it was proven that, if anyone had used chemical weapons in Syria, it was the Western government-backed ‘Syrian rebels’ aka ‘al-Qaeda’, and that those weapons had been supplied to them by the same Western governments and intel agencies via proxies like the Bahrain or Qatar government. The same spurious allegation has been raised again, as if the ‘elite’ believe that the average citizen has a memory span of only a few months (maybe they’re right about that). Read More →

Britam Defence: Leaked Documents: False Flags are Standard Operating Procedure for Western Governments

by ⋅ 1 Comment
Western-backed death squads in Syria aka 'al-qaeda'

Western-backed death squads in Syria aka ‘al-qaeda’

Western governments (in league with their Middle Eastern client states) began their proxy war attack (via paid mercenaries aka ‘al-qaeda’) on Syria in 2011. The ongoing Syria campaign is just the latest in a long line of direct or indirect attempts at ‘regime change’ by the Western (and global) elite over the past 10 years (although their history of attacking and destabilizing and overthrowing sovereign governments goes back at least 100 years).

Each time I have commented on these illegal and inhuman invasions and proxy wars, I have pointed to the evidence that we are not, and never have been, dealing with a ‘popular revolution’ or  a ‘civil war’ or a ‘terrorist threat’, but rather, always and everywhere with the age-old, tried and tested murderous tactics and outrageous lies of Western powers.

These type of ‘regime change’ operations include the use of several scurrilous, brutal and, frankly psychopathic tactics: Read More →

Assad’s ‘Chemical Weapons’ – Sexing up the Iraq War redux

by ⋅ 4 Comments

‘How do I hate thee, let me count the ways’ – Hilary Clinton gets off on killing civilians

I really have to hand it to the war mongers; while they certainly lack imagination, their pathological persistence seems to know no bounds.

The full details of Western imperial plan for the destruction of Syria is now becoming clear with the purported arrival of the USS Eisenhower off the Syrian coast. US patriot missiles have already been deployed on the Turkey/Syria border (along with hundreds of American and European troops to operate them), in preparation for Syrian government attempts to hit US bases and military sites in Turkey as a response to any NATO invasion. Of course, a ‘Syrian’ attack on these positions would provide the perfect pretext for NATO to get its hands dirty in Syria. Read More →

‘Killing His Own People’

by ⋅ Leave a Comment

“Killing your own people” – a good strategy in the face of foreign invasions (if you’re an imbecile)

In case you haven’t noticed, Western governments have never shown much creativity when trying to find an excuse to wage a war against another nation. Usually, they just rely on the gullibility of the masses of people and on the mainstream media to repeatedly spread the lie. On several occasions, such a the Gulf of Tonkin incident, their creativity has extended to attacking themselves (or claiming they have been attacked).

In recent years, as the US political and military juggernaut has grown more desperate in its search for new foreign resources to prop up the failing empire, the causus belli has been reduced to the puerile claim that such and such a leader is “killing his own people”. But the plausibility of this claim, in terms of the leaders against whom it has been used, and the context in which it has been used, rests on a belief that is entirely implausible. Read More →

State-Sponsored Terrorism – Western Journalists Embedded With ‘al-Qaeda’ in Syria

by ⋅ Leave a Comment

Remember me?

State-sponsored terrorism used to be a rather simple affair, where a state would order its military (or other covert armed group) to carry out terrorist acts against a civilian population, domestic or foreign. Over the course of the last 20 years or so however, state sponsored terrorism as practiced by Western ‘Democracies’ has evolved into a much more convoluted and complex operation.

Take ‘al-qaeda’ for example. The best way to understand the true role of ‘al-qaeda’, is to first understand the role played by the Soviet Union and ‘Communism’ as popularised by Western governments. Read More →

One Man’s Suicide Bomber – National Security Building Bomb in Damascus and Bourgas Bus Bomb

by ⋅ 1 Comment

The Mossad bus bombing in Bourgas, Bulgaria

Today, July 18th 2012, two acts of murder were committed. One occurred in Damascus, Syria, the other in Bourgas, Bulgaria, but that’s where the similarity ends, or so our Western governments and mainstream medias would have us believe.

In Damascus, the targets were high level members of the Syrian government (and anyone else who happened to be in the room). In Bulgaria, the targets were Jewish holiday-makers.

In Damascus, a spokesman for the ‘Free Syrian Army’ claimed that one of their members planted a TNT and C-4-based device inside the building ahead of the meeting, and then detonated the bomb remotely before fleeing to safety.  The ‘Free Syrian Army’ is, as I have pointed out, made up of CIA-trained and funded mercenaries who don’t care how many innocent people they kill because they are being paid to do so.

Syrian state television, on the other hand, said that the attack was carried out by a “terrorist suicide bomber”.

The strange thing is, both claims are more or less correct. Read More →